Bohr revolutionized the orbital model. He said the electrons had to be on a series of specific paths. These paths were like the orbits of the planets around the sun. He called them electron orbitals. Each orbital has an associated energy level. The amount of energy emitted is exactly the difference in energy between the two orbitals. The earth revolves around the sun following its motions of rotation and revolution.
As other planets do. Newton demonstrated what forces are at play, that is the gravitational attraction. Einstein tells us something more by introducing space-time.
The microscopic level, i. There is a nucleus similar to our sun, and then there are electrons located in orbits. Each orbit has a limited number of electrons with very specific characteristics in terms of spin.
Well, with a similar analogy, orbitals are our planets and electrons its inhabitants. When we observe the world, at the macroscopic or microscopic level, the substantial configuration is the same. Something controls everything sun , something else follows the motion and keeps the atom alive.
No particular reason why? In theory, we humans could also jump from one planet to another but with a considerable expenditure of energy. The only problem is that it takes energy, orders of magnitude larger. Remember that, when an electron jumps from one orbit to another, we observe it through a photon that is emitted or absorbed as appropriate. That is, a ray of light that enters or leaves matter. In the first case, I think of a meteorite that enters the earth with force, thus changing evolution, forcing then to leave the house to take refuge elsewhere, in another orbital.
We know that electrons of the same type cannot exist within an orbit, technically with the same spin. Without going into details, spin is related to the electromagnetic behavior of an electron. There is much debate as to what, exactly, this wave function represents: Some think of the wave function as a real physical thing and some think of the wave function simply as an expression of our knowledge or of the lack thereof regarding the underlying state of a particular quantum object.
Quantum physics is known for being strange because its predictions are dramatically different from our everyday experience at least for humans. This happens because the effects involved get smaller as objects get larger: If you want to see quantum behavior, you basically want to see particles behaving like waves, and the wavelength decreases as the momentum increases. Quantum mechanics is not local. What does that mean? This, however, technically does not allow information to be sent faster than the speed of light, although there have been several attempts to find a way to use quantum nonlocality.
Quantum mechanics is the best theory we have for describing the world of subatomic particles. Perhaps the best known of its mysteries is the fact that the result of a quantum experiment can change depending on whether or not we choose to measure certain properties of the particles involved.
When this was noticed, the scientists were deeply troubled. It seemed to undermine many concepts in practice with a world out there, independent of us. We can interpret this as parallel worlds.
The main advantage of the many-worlds interpretation is a realistic interpretation. It is often greeted with disbelief, as it implies that people along with other objects branch out constantly in countless copies, but this, in itself, is no argument against it.
At the heart of quantum mechanics is the idea that we cannot specify accurately the location of an electron. All we can say is that there is a probability that it exists within this certain volume of space. Use the link below to answer the following questions:. Skip to main content. Electrons in Atoms. Search for:. Quantum Mechanics How do you study something that seemingly makes no sense? Figure 1.
These amazing findings were among the earliest to suggest that electrons, which had always been viewed as particles, might have some properties usually ascribed to waves.
That is, as de Broglie has suggested in , an electron seems to have a wavelength inversely related to its momentum, and to display wave-type diffraction. I should mention that analogous diffraction was also observed when other small light particles e. In all such cases, Bragg-like diffraction is observed and the Bragg equation is found to govern the scattering angles if one assigns a wavelength to the scattering particle according to.
The observation that electrons and other small light particles display wave like behavior was important because these particles are what all atoms and molecules are made of. So, if we want to fully understand the motions and behavior of molecules, we must be sure that we can adequately describe such properties for their constituents. Because the classical Newtonian equations do not contain factors that suggest wave properties for electrons or nuclei moving freely in space, the above behaviors presented significant challenges.
Another problem that arose in early studies of atoms and molecules resulted from the study of the photons emitted from atoms and ions that had been heated or otherwise excited e. It was found that each kind of atom i. An example of such emission spectra is shown in Figure 1. In the top panel, we see all of the lines emitted with their wave lengths indicated in nano-meters. The other panels show how these lines have been analyzed by scientists whose names are associated into patterns that relate to the specific energy levels between which transitions occur to emit the corresponding photons.
In the early attempts to rationalize such spectra in terms of electronic motions, one described an electron as moving about the atomic nuclei in circular orbits such as shown in Figure 1. However, nowhere in this model is a concept that relates to the experimental fact that each atom emits only certain kinds of photons. It was believed that photon emission occurred when an electron moving in a larger circular orbit lost energy and moved to a smaller circular orbit.
However, the Newtonian dynamics that produced the above equation would allow orbits of any radius, and hence any energy, to be followed. Thus, it would appear that the electron should be able to emit photons of any energy as it moved from orbit to orbit.
Thus, the Bohr relationship that is analogous to the Bragg equation that determines at what angles constructive interference can occur is.
Both this equation and the analogous Bragg equation are illustrations of what we call boundary conditions; they are extra conditions placed on the wavelength to produce some desired character in the resultant wave in these cases, constructive interference.
Of course, there remains the question of why one must impose these extra conditions when the Newton dynamics do not require them. The resolution of this paradox is one of the things that quantum mechanics does. So, it is the result that only certain orbits are allowed that causes only certain energies to occur and thus only certain energies to be observed in the emitted photons.
In such an interpretation of the experimental data, one claims that a photon of energy. The Bohr formula for energy levels did not agree as well with the observed pattern of emission spectra for species containing more than a single electron. However, it does give a reasonable fit, for example, to the Na atom spectra if one examines only transitions involving only the single 3s valence electron. It turns out this Rydberg formula can also be applied to certain electronic states of molecules.
0コメント