Why calling people hipsters needs to go




















So what next? Though widely derided by the fashion world, this plain, super-normal style is arguably a reaction to the commodification of individuality, the idea that you can buy uniqueness off the peg in Topshop. But for many, including Josh, the desire to categorise people is infuriating. Though sometimes identified as a hipster aesthetically speaking, her work, which focuses on sexuality, self-identity and contemporary feminism, would suggest she is much more than that.

What is a hipster, anyway? It is such a general term. This article is more than 7 years old. Now that cocktails in jam jars have made it to EastEnders, what's next for those who would be 'alternative'?

Have you spotted any hipsters in the wild? Their motives and sincerity were constantly being questioned. The hippies, too, collapsed, but not before being thoroughly mined for salable material by the marketplace. A decade or so later, the punks, having seen the last two countercultures co-opted, went for something more extreme.

It would be untouchable, undesirable, unmanageable. We all know how that worked out. Not only could bourgeois society swallow it, it swallowed it whole, and we wound up with Ramones baby clothes and Sex Pistols credit cards. From the Beats onward, each movement has yielded great art but then wound up press-ganged into the service of capitalism, its quest for the original and the authentic ultimately just increasing the volume of banal plastic consumer goods dumped daily into the churning river of commerce.

More than half a century since the Beats, the fallen countercultural gods proclaim from their graves: look upon my works and despair And all those things are true to a degree. Every previous subculture spent a good deal of time getting the shit kicked out of it by cops, rednecks, jocks, etc.

That general absence of real threat and true alienation -- even kids stuck in backwaters can find likeminded souls online -- removes a lot of the focus, direction, and spite that ordinarily drives a subculture forward.

Though I guess you could also argue that when rage has been so thoroughly and enthusiastically co-opted by the mainstream, maybe twee placidity is revolutionary. Gay marriage is legal, weed is decriminalized, rock and rap are sanitized and corporate.

The only things middle class America is really afraid of at this point are Snapchat and terrorism. Now you just need to read the right blog. This accelerates the trend cycle to such a degree that anything potentially hip will be analyzed to death before it has a chance to evolve.

The perpetual churn led to the widely mocked hipster trend-panic, as he or she scrambles to stay ahead of an ever-steepening taste curve: now I like kitschy lunch boxes! Now I like organic farming! Now I have boat shoes! And I sympathize. Ergo: Atari! Mason jars! Which as far as I can tell was to be more like punk. Eventually, things started getting contentious, and hipster became a dirty word.

This in-group competition, more than anything else, is why the term hipster is primarily a pejorative -- an insult that belongs to the family of poseur, faker, phony, scenester, and hanger-on. The challenge does not clarify whether the challenger rejects values in common with the hipster -- of style, savoir vivre, cool, etc.

It just asserts that its target adopts them with the wrong motives. Lloyd showed how a culture of aspiring artists who worked day jobs in bars and coffee shops could unintentionally provide a milieu for new, late-capitalist commerce in design, marketing, and web development.

The neo-bohemian neighborhoods, near to the explosion of new wealth in city financial centers, became amusement districts for a new class of rich young people. The indie bohemians denigrated as slackers encountered the flannel-clad proto-businessmen and dot-com paper millionaires denigrated as yuppies , and something unanticipated came of this friction. Over the years, there developed such a thing as a hipster style and range of art and finally, by extension, something like a characteristic attitude and Weltanschauung.

Fundamentally, however, the hipster continues to be defined by the same tension faced by those early colonizers of Wicker Park.

The hipster is that person, overlapping with the intentional dropout or the unintentionally declassed individual—the neo-bohemian, the vegan or bicyclist or skatepunk, the would-be blue-collar or postracial twentysomething, the starving artist or graduate student—who in fact aligns himself both with rebel subculture and with the dominant class, and thus opens up a poisonous conduit between the two.

The question arises: What was it about the turn-of-the-century moment that made it so clear—as it was immediately clear—that the character had to have this name, the hipster, which was so fraught with historical meaning? Subculture has never had a problem with neologism or exploitation of slang, from emo to punk to hippie.

The hipster, however, was someone else already. The hip reaction was to insist, purely symbolically, on forms of knowledge that they possessed before anyone else, indeed before the creation of positive knowledge—a priori. Broyard focused on the password language of hip slang. The return of the term after reframed the knowledge question. Hipster, in its revival, referred to an air of knowing about exclusive things before anyone else. But these hipsters were white, and singularly unmoved by race and racial integration.

These were the most visible emblems of a small and surprising subculture, where the source of a priori knowledge seemed to be nostalgia for suburban whiteness. This recalled the seventies culture of white flight to the suburbs, and the most uncanny thing about the turn-of-the-millennium white hipsters is that symbolically, in their styles and attitudes, they seemed to announce that whiteness and capital were flowing back into the formerly impoverished city. And rather than an indie or bohemian subculture, it felt like an ethnicity—with its clannishness, its claiming of microneighborhoods from other, older migrants Chinese, Puerto Ricans, Orthodox Jews , and its total uninterest in integrating into the local populations.

It would be too limited, however, to understand the contemporary hipster as simply someone concerned with a priori knowledge as a means of social dominance. Consider hipster art. At the same time that hipsters were dressing like seventies-model Stanley Kowalskis, they were consuming culture that was considerably more anxious about machismo, heterosexuality, and maturity.

Eggers tried to claim the older Flaming Lips as allies. The tensions of this art revolved around the very old dyad of adulthood and a child-centered world, but landed heavily on the side of the child.

Formally, there was an aestheticization of the mode of pastiche, which Fredric Jameson identified in the early eighties as a characteristic mode of postmodern narrative. Reflexivity was used as a means to get back to sentimental emotion. In the nineties, it had become commonplace to assume that one could no longer say heartfelt, sincere things outright, because all genuine utterance would be stolen and repeated as advertising. Whatever anguish this caused seemed gone in the artifacts of the early aughts.

The ironic games were weightless. As the movement gains mainstream popularity, it has the potential to spread its ideas and increase support for obscure bands, thrift stores and quirky fashions. Yet these large groups of people with similar ideas may end up conforming to their own non-mainstream genre, especially if a few popular brands take the reins of the culture. Learn more about him here. Reach him via e-mail at jeremy. The blog closed in September of Facebook Twitter Email. Hipster culture: The paradox of popularity.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000